A Critique of Taylor's Concept of Multiculturalism in Relation to Essay

A Critique of Taylors Concept of Multiculturalism in intercourse to Nation Building - Essay ExampleThe society is a framework within which different lot interact to create various inclinations and trends which define the culture3. The world is a dynamic place and as changes slip by in societies, there argon numerous tendencies that makes it impossible for cultures to continue to be transferred from generation to generation. This therefore brings to evasive action the model of cultural endurance which is concerned with the ability of a given culture to stand the tryout of time that comes with modernisation4. Professor Charles Taylor supports the communitarian school of thought which claims that the idea of individualism evolved as a consequence of near failures in the development of the modern Eurocentric society5. Due to individualism, the risk of cultural survival is now high than it has ever been in the past. He holds that the replacement of communal structures with indivi dualism is gradually causing the human die hard to lose important morals and values. As an antidote to this, communitarians believe that the social structures should be rebuilt and this can be done through enhancing different cultures in a given nation. This idea has become popularly cognize as the recognition of culture. Recognition of culture therefore refers to the respect of peoples distinct cultures and allowing different people to act their different cultures in a given nation. ... Taylors argument, called the politics of equal respect implies that distinct cultures will consume to be respected and allowed to thrive in a nation, even if it comes with wide differences. Theoretically, the recognition of culture government agency that if people from extremely different ends of the world come together in a given geographic area, they should be allowed to maintain their unique values, irrespective of how different they are. It is therefore obvious that this position of Taylor gives room for a wide diversity of possibilities which cannot go unchecked. In this paper, I examine the key debates of Taylor in relation to the concept of the recognition of differences in cultures. I will critically assess the validity of the communitarian views on the subject by comparing them to counter arguments and criticisms of his ideas. I will utilise various philosophical positions and ideologies of various thinkers and theorists and use them to authorise or reject various propositions presented by Taylor and other communitarians. The paper argues that the idea of communitarianism is the best way for the survival of todays society and although there are some inherent challenges in it that threaten to prevent cohesion it is the all viable option in socializing children. The Basis of Taylors Argument Taylor, in his book Ethics of genuineness built a strong case against the existing systems and structures in the modern society. He identifies that there are three main mala ises or cankers in our modern society that are potentially dangerous to the up-to-the-minute society7. The first malaise is the concept of individualism. People tend to have the freedom to decide what is right and require to do it for themselves. Thus, whatever is convenient to an individual